|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Student Evaluation of Instructor Spring Semester 2019 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
College of Arts and Sciences |
|
|
Student Evaluation of Instructor |
|
|
|
|
|
Course: |
18925 CSC 4350 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-CTW |
|
Instructor: |
Akshita Maradapu Vera Venkata Sai |
|
Distribution: |
Online |
|
Enrollment: |
38 |
|
Respondents: |
29 |
|
Percentage: |
76.3% |
|
I. |
Indicate your current degree program: |
Total |
% |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Undergraduate |
19 |
100.0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Master's |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Doctoral |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Postbaccalaureate |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
II. |
Indicate what % of your program is completed: |
Total |
% |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Below 20% |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
21-40% |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
41-60% |
1 |
5.3 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
61-80% |
6 |
31.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Above 80% |
12 |
63.2 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
III. |
This course is: |
Total |
% |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Required |
15 |
83.3 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Required, but a choice among several |
2 |
11.1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
An elective |
1 |
5.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
IV. |
The grade I expect to earn in this course is: |
Total |
% |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
A |
10 |
55.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
B |
5 |
27.8 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
C |
2 |
11.1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
D |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
F |
1 |
5.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
N/A |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
V. |
My grade point average (GPA) at G.S.U. is about: |
Total |
% |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
3.33-4.0 |
10 |
55.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
3.01-3.32 |
1 |
5.6 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2.74-3.0 |
3 |
16.7 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2.47-2.73 |
2 |
11.1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Below 2.47 |
2 |
11.1 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
5 - Very Descriptive |
||||||||||||||
|
|
1 - Not at all Descriptive |
||||||||||||||
|
|
0 - N/A |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Inst |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
1. |
Explained the goals of this course clearly. |
|
14 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.6 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
2. |
Explained the grading system clearly. |
|
13 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
3. |
Gave assignments related to the goals of this course. |
|
12 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
4. |
Followed the plan for the course as established in the syllabus. |
|
13 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
5. |
Was well prepared. |
|
11 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
6. |
Spoke in a way that communicated the subject in an understandable manner. |
|
11 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.2 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
7. |
Responded constructively and thoughtfully to questions and comments. |
|
11 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
8. |
Used class time effectively. |
|
10 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.3 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
9. |
Had designated office and student appointment hours and was available to students during these times. |
|
13 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
10. |
Assigned grades fairly. |
|
14 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.6 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
11. |
Returned test results and evaluations of my work in a reasonable period of time (typically, 7-10 days or less is considered a reasonable College benchmark). |
|
16 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.7 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
12. |
Met the class according to the published Schedule of Classes. |
|
16 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.7 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
13. |
Stimulated my thinking and gave me new insights into the subject. |
|
10 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
3.9 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
14. |
Related well to students. |
|
10 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.3 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
15. |
Motivated me to learn. |
|
11 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
4.2 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
16. |
Assigned readings (including the text(s)) that contributed to what I learned. |
|
11 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
5 - Very High |
||||||||||||||
|
|
4 - High |
||||||||||||||
|
|
3 - Average |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2 - Below Average |
||||||||||||||
|
|
1 - Poor |
||||||||||||||
|
|
0 - N/A |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Inst |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
17. |
Considering both the limitations and possibilities of the subject matter and course, how would you rate the overall teaching effectiveness of the instructor? |
|
10 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
4.3 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Comment Area |
|||||||||||||||
|
1. |
Fun and easy |
||||||||||||||
|
2. |
Akshita communicates very clearly. The course content needs improved, but her instruction was great. |
||||||||||||||
|
3. |
Great instructor. She taught effectively and really ensured the class understood the content. |
||||||||||||||
|
4. |
I thought your teaching style was relatable and made the class more interesting. I think the flaws that existed in the class were not due to you. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Release: 1.0.0